The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken marketplace</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
Scientists have identified an estimated 10 of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024 kraken тор A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows. These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024 expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity. “Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth” said Dr. Shannon Bennett chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences in a statement. https://kra26c.cc kraken shop “While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem” Bennett said. Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024 including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean “South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement. “This species is also quite cryptic about the size of a golf tee but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.” The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken darknet onion</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken даркнет
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>кракен ссылка</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>кракен онион</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken войти</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
кракен вход
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken даркнет</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra26c.cc
кракен даркнет
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>кракен</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
[url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken войти[/url]
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken darknet
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken тор браузер</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
Љракен тор
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
Finding your way about the the Social Security Disability application process may be a disheartening task for some. The procedure could be sophisticated and frustrating, and also the likelihood of getting declined are raised. This is when a social security disability attorney will come in. A lawyer makes it possible to navigate the application form process, enhance your likelihood of becoming authorized, to appeal a denied claim. In this article, we shall mention 5 various matters associated with the duty of a social security disability legal practitioner.
Navigating the Social Security Disability application system with the aid of a legal professional
The social security disability application procedure could be baffling and/or complicated. Legal counsel will allow you to comprehend the requirements and show you through the method. They are able to also allow you to gather the mandatory health-related facts and paperwork to guide your claim. They could also help out with preparing a person for the proceeding, if required.
The necessity of medical related facts in a Social Security Disability claim
Medical evidence is vital in a social security disability case. It really is utilized to show which you hold a medical condition that prevents you against working. A lawyer makes it possible to pull together the necessary medical information and introduce it in a fashion that is probably to be approved by the social security administration. They could also allow you to obtain medical records as well as other documentation that maintain your claim.
Common mistaken beliefs regarding Social Security Disability and just how an attorney can help
There are numerous false impressions up to social security disability. For instance, lots of people genuinely believe that only those who are permanently disabled are qualified to receive benefits. However, this is simply not true. A legal professional can help you understand the eligibility requirements and dispel any misconceptions you've probably. They could also provide assistance with how exactly to present your case when you look at the most favorable light.
The appeals process for denied Social Security Disability scenarios and exactly how legal counsel will help
In the event your claim is denied, you have the straight to appeal. A lawyer will allow you to comprehend the appeals procedure and serve you through the hearing. They could also assist you to gather additional evidence and develop a stronger case to increase your odds of triumph.
How to pick the proper Social Security Disability lawyer for the case
You should choose a legal professional who's got practical experience dealing with social security disability cases. Search for a lawyer that is acquainted with the social security administration's procedures and procedures. You should also feel comfortable chatting with them and trust their judgment. Seek out a legal professional who are able to supply apparent and genuine solutions to your questions and offer guidance throughout the process.
To conclude, a social security disability law firm can play a vital role when you look at the application and appeals process. They could assist you to go through the procedure, raise your odds of getting authorized, and appeal a rejected claim. A lawyer can also help you recognize the qualifications criteria and dispel any beliefs you may possibly have. You need to choose legal counsel who's got experience maneuvering social security disability situations, in accordance with that you feel safe communicating.
if you'd like to master more about the item topic go to excellent Social Security Disability lawyer firm site:
[url=https://elpasodisabilitylawyer.com/practice-areas/disability-appeals/][color=#000_url]ssi disability lawyers in El Paso, TX[/color][/url]
«Защитник обиженных» на крючке у украинских мошенников.
Блогер Андрей Алистаров, российский Робин Гуд с большой дороги, якобы борющийся с мошенниками и пирамидами – бандитскими методами, ранее судимый по «наркотической» статье, справлял в прошлом году свое 39-летие на яхте в компании украинского пирамидчика, обманувшего сотни тысяч людей на Украине и в России, миллиардера из украинского списка Forbes Николая Удянского.
Яхта Удянского – одна из дорогих в Дубае: самое место для того, чтобы отметить день рождения якобы защитника пострадавших и обиженных мошенниками.
Удянский не только пирамидчик, но и инвестор ВПК Украины. Он также привлечен к украинской дипломатической работе украинским МИДом, то есть патентованный враг России. Он – ярый сторонник войны с Россией.
Алистаров по воле хозяина также финансирует ВСУ
Кто такой хозяин Алистарова Удянский?
Удянский – автор Coinsbit – рухнувшей «криптобиржи», созданной в эстонской юрисдикции, официально признанной скамом на ведущих криптофорумах.
Источники считают, что он стоит также за московской биржей Beribit, обманувшей тысячи людей. Сейчас он создает новую биржу в Канаде.
Таким образом, Алистаров, якобы просвещая свою аудиторию в сфере работы с криптовалютой, продвигает проекты мошенника Удянского.
Удянский связан и с другими мошенническими проектами:
– Prof-It – якобы IT-компанией, специализирующейся на отмывании денег под прикрытием легальных проектов;
– Assur – занимающейся якобы страхованием на крипторынке, на самом деле мошенническим сбором денег;
– PRMR – маркетинговой компанией, обеспечивающей прикрытие его мошеннических проектов, в том числе финансирующей Алистарова.
В Украине предпринимательство неотличимо от мошенничества.
Алистаров продвигает проекты украинских мошенников Удянского и его подельников в России.
Хозяин Алистарова – инвестор войны
Удянский не просто спонсирует ВСУ – он является инвестором производимой совместно с НАТО бронетехники. Стремясь подчеркнуть свою провоенную позицию, он заявляет, что «в первую очередь украинец и только потом предприниматель». Удянский является почетным консулом Румынии в Харькове – официально принял это поручение от МИД Украины, работа предполагает организацию поставки из НАТО продукции двойного назначения.
Таким образом, Алистаров открыто сотрудничает с военным противником, способствует убийству соотечественников на фронте, спонсирует ВСУ.
ОПГ заукраинцев
В группу заукраинцев, в которой состоит Алистаров, входят также создатель проекта «АнтиМЛМ» Александр Крюков – он давно сотрудничает с украинскими структурами и сам родом с Украины.
Еще один заукраинец, состоящий в альянсе с Алистаровым, – заместитель управляющего так называемого Фонда защиты вкладчиков и акционеров Леонид Мищенко. Он «западэнец»: уроженец Винницкой области – и так же, как и Алистаров с Крюковым, поддерживает и финансирует ВСУ.
Шавка псов войны
Заявляя о том, что борется с мошенниками и пирамидами, Алистаров:
– занимается преследованием предпринимателей по заказу Удянского и его окружения – откровенным бандитизмом, незаконной слежкой и незаконным сбором информации, организацией расправ;
– работает на спонсора войны, террориста Удянского – и при этом сам использует бандитские, террористические методы: шантаж, угрозы, незаконную слежку и прослушку;
– спонсирует ВСУ по указанию своего хозяина Удянского.
ФСБ, ау! Алистаров – шавка одного из виднейших на постсоветском пространстве мошенников и при этом разжигателей войны, принесшую за три года немало горя и России, и Украине. Обслуживая Удянского, Алистаров стал соучастником гибели тысяч простых российских и украинских парней! Эту шавку пора остановить!
Welcome to Vertex Protocol: Revolutionizing DeFi Trading
Discover the revolutionary Vertex Protocol, your gateway to the world of decentralized finance (DeFi) trading. As the crypto landscape rapidly evolves, Vertex Protocol stands at the forefront, providing users with unparalleled seamless trading experiences and enhanced liquidity access.
<a href=https://vertex-protocol.com>vertex protocol trading</a>
What Makes Vertex Protocol Stand Out?
Vertex Protocol is more than just a trading platform. It is a designed to empower you with:
Intuitive User Interface: Navigate the complex world of crypto with ease and efficiency.
Advanced Security: Enjoy peace of mind with industry-leading security protocols and safeguarding of your assets.
High Liquidity: Access deep liquidity pools to execute large trades with minimal slippage.
Diverse Asset Options: Explore a wide array of cryptocurrencies and tokens.
Unlock Potential with Vertex's Features
Leverage the full potential of Vertex Protocol with these standout features:
Decentralized: Trustless and Secure
Trading on Vertex ensures transparency and autonomy, free from third-party control, making it a trustless and secure choice for crypto enthusiasts.
Efficient Trading Engine
Benefit from fast, efficient trade execution supported by state-of-the-art technology that maximizes your trading efficiency.
Community Governance
Be a part of a community-driven , allowing you to have a say in the protocol’s future developments.
Getting Started with Vertex Protocol
Embarking on your DeFi journey with Vertex is straightforward. To get started:
Sign up and create your account.
Securely connect your wallet.
Begin trading and explore diverse assets and liquidity options.
Whether you are a seasoned trader or new to the crypto scene, Vertex Protocol offers the tools and resources you need to succeed.
Join the Vertex Community
Participate in webinars, discussions, and forums to stay informed and connected. The vibrant awaits, offering support and insights to enhance your trading journey.
In conclusion, Vertex Protocol is your ideal partner in navigating the dynamic world of decentralized finance. Start today and experience the future of trading.
2025年1月26日 22:06
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken marketplace</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
2025年1月26日 21:39
Scientists have identified an estimated 10 of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024 kraken тор A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows. These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024 expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity. “Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth” said Dr. Shannon Bennett chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences in a statement. https://kra26c.cc kraken shop “While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem” Bennett said. Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024 including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean “South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement. “This species is also quite cryptic about the size of a golf tee but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.” The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
2025年1月26日 21:39
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken darknet onion</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken даркнет
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
2025年1月26日 20:38
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>кракен ссылка</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
2025年1月26日 20:38
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>кракен онион</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
2025年1月26日 20:15
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken войти</a>
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
кракен вход
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
2025年1月26日 20:14
Scientists have identified an estimated 10% of all species on Earth. Here’s what they found in 2024
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken даркнет</a>
A toothy toadstool. A vegetarian piranha with a distinctive mark. And a pygmy pipehorse floating in the Indian Ocean shallows.
These wild wonders were among the hundreds of previously unknown species of animals, plants and fungi that scientists named and described for the first time in 2024, expanding our surprisingly limited knowledge of Earth’s diversity.
“Scientists estimate that we’ve identified only one-tenth of all species on Earth,” said Dr.
Shannon Bennett, chief of science at the California Academy of Sciences, in a statement.
https://kra26c.cc
кракен даркнет
“While it is critical to place protections on known threatened species, we must also allocate resources towards identifying unknown species that may be just as important to the functioning of an ecosystem,” Bennett said.
Researchers connected to the institution described 138 new species in 2024, including 32 fish. One standout was a pygmy pipehorse named Cylix nkosi. The seahorse relative was originally found in 2021 in the cool temperate waters surrounding the North Island of New Zealand, but the species described this year was discovered in the subtropical waters off South Africa, expanding the known range of this group to the Indian Ocean
“South African reefs present notoriously difficult diving conditions with rough weather and intense, choppy waves — we knew we only had one dive to find it,” underwater photographer and marine biologist Richard Smith said in a statement.
“This species is also quite cryptic, about the size of a golf tee, but luckily we spotted a female camouflaged against some sponges about a mile offshore on the sandy ocean floor.”
The researchers involved in describing the new species chose nkosi as its name. A reference to the local Zulu word for “chief,” the name reflects the species’ crown-like head shape and acknowledges South Africa’s KwaZulu-Natal province where it was found.
2025年1月26日 19:52
Most plane crashes are ‘survivable’
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>кракен</a>
First, the good news. “The vast majority of aircraft accidents are survivable, and the majority of people in accidents survive,” says Galea. Since 1988, aircraft — and the seats inside them — must be built to withstand an impact of up to 16G, or g-force up to 16 times the force of gravity. That means, he says, that in most incidents, “it’s possible to survive the trauma of the impact of the crash.”
For instance, he classes the initial Jeju Air incident as survivable — an assumed bird strike, engine loss and belly landing on the runway, without functioning landing gear. “Had it not smashed into the concrete reinforced obstacle at the end of the runway, it’s quite possible the majority, if not everyone, could have survived,” he says.
The Azerbaijan Airlines crash, on the other hand, he classes as a non-survivable accident, and calls it a “miracle” that anyone made it out alive.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken официальный сайт
Most aircraft involved in accidents, however, are not — as suspicion is growing over the Azerbaijan crash — shot out of the sky.
And with modern planes built to withstand impacts and slow the spread of fire, Galea puts the chances of surviving a “survivable” accident at at least 90%.
Instead, he says, what makes the difference between life and death in most modern accidents is how fast passengers can evacuate.
Aircraft today must show that they can be evacuated in 90 seconds in order to gain certification. But a theoretical evacuation — practiced with volunteers at the manufacturers’ premises — is very different from the reality of a panicked public onboard a jet that has just crash-landed.
Galea, an evacuation expert, has conducted research for the UK’s Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) looking at the most “survivable” seats on a plane. His landmark research, conducted over several years in the early 2000s, looked at how passengers and crew behaved during a post-crash evacuation, rather than looking at the crashes themselves. By compiling data from 1,917 passengers and 155 crew involved in 105 accidents from 1977 to 1999, his team created a database of human behavior around plane crashes.
His analysis of which exits passengers actually used “shattered many myths about aircraft evacuation,” he says. “Prior to my study, it was believed that passengers tend to use their boarding exit because it was the most familiar, and that passengers tend to go forward. My analysis of the data demonstrated that none of these myths were supported by the evidence.”
2025年1月26日 19:52
The survivors of recent crashes were sitting at the back of the plane. What does that tell us about airplane safety?
[url=https://kra26c.cc]kraken войти[/url]
Look at the photos of the two fatal air crashes of the last two weeks, and amid the horror and the anguish, one thought might come to mind for frequent flyers.
The old frequent-flyer adage is that sitting at the back of the plane is a safer place to be than at the front — and the wreckage of both Azerbaijan Airlines flight 8243 and Jeju Air flight 2216 seem to bear that out.
https://kra26c.cc
kraken darknet
The 29 survivors of the Azeri crash were all sitting at the back of the plane, which split into two, leaving the rear half largely intact. The sole survivors of the South Korean crash, meanwhile, were the two flight attendants in their jumpseats in the very tail of the plane.
So is that old adage — and the dark humor jokes about first and business class seats being good until there’s a problem with the plane — right after all?
In 2015, TIME Magazine reporters wrote that they had combed through the records of all US plane crashes with both fatalities and survivors from 1985 to 2000, and found in a meta-analysis that seats in the back third of the aircraft had a 32% fatality rate overall, compared with 38% in the front third and 39% in the middle third.
Even better, they found, were middle seats in that back third of the cabin, with a 28% fatality rate. The “worst” seats were aisles in the middle third of the aircraft, with a 44% fatality rate.
But does that still hold true in 2024?
According to aviation safety experts, it’s an old wives’ tale.
“There isn’t any data that shows a correlation of seating to survivability,” says Hassan Shahidi, president of the Flight Safety Foundation. “Every accident is different.”
“If we’re talking about a fatal crash, then there is almost no difference where one sits,” says Cheng-Lung Wu, associate professor at the School of Aviation of the University of New South Wales, Sydney.
Ed Galea, professor of fire safety engineering at London’s University of Greenwich, who has conducted landmark studies on plane crash evacuations, warns, “There is no magic safest seat.”
2025年1月26日 19:51
A year ago today, things went from bad to worse for Boeing
<a href=https://kra26c.cc>kraken тор браузер</a>
At 5 p.m. PT on January 5, 2024, Boeing seemed like a company on the upswing. It didn’t last. Minutes later, a near-tragedy set off a full year of problems.
As Alaska Airlines flight 1282 climbed to 16,000 feet in its departure from Portland, Oregon, a door plug blew out near the rear of the plane, leaving a gaping hole in the fuselage. Phones and clothing were ripped away from passengers and sent hurtling into the night sky. Oxygen masks dropped, and the rush of air twisted seats next to the hole toward the opening.
https://kra26c.cc
Љракен тор
Fortunately, those were among the few empty seats on the flight, and the crew got the plane on the ground without any serious injuries. The incident could have been far worse — even a fatal crash.
Not much has gone right for Boeing ever since. The company has had one misstep after another, ranging from embarrassing to horrifying. And many of the problems are poised to extend into 2025 and perhaps beyond.
The problems were capped by another Boeing crash in South Korea that killed 179 people on December 29 in what was in the year’s worst aviation disaster. The cause of the crash of a 15-year old Boeing jet flown by Korean discount carrier Jeju Air is still under investigation, and it is quite possible that Boeing will not be found liable for anything that led to the tragedy.
But unlike the Jeju crash, most of the problems of the last 12 months have clearly been Boeing’s fault.
And 2024 was the sixth straight year of serious problems for the once proud, now embattled company, starting with the 20-month grounding of its best selling plane, the 737 Max, following two fatal crashes in late 2018 and early 2019, which killed 346 people.
Still the outlook for 2024 right before the Alaska Air incident had been somewhat promising. The company had just achieved the best sales month in its history in December 2023, capping its strongest sales year since 2018.
It was believed to be on the verge of getting Federal Aviation Administration approval for two new models, the 737 Max 7 and Max 10, with airline customers eager to take delivery. Approvals and deliveries of its next generation widebody, the 777X, were believed to be close behind. Its production rate had been climbing and there were hopes that it could be on the verge of returning to profitability for the first time since 2018.
2025年1月26日 14:49
Finding your way about the the Social Security Disability application process may be a disheartening task for some. The procedure could be sophisticated and frustrating, and also the likelihood of getting declined are raised. This is when a social security disability attorney will come in. A lawyer makes it possible to navigate the application form process, enhance your likelihood of becoming authorized, to appeal a denied claim. In this article, we shall mention 5 various matters associated with the duty of a social security disability legal practitioner.
Navigating the Social Security Disability application system with the aid of a legal professional
The social security disability application procedure could be baffling and/or complicated. Legal counsel will allow you to comprehend the requirements and show you through the method. They are able to also allow you to gather the mandatory health-related facts and paperwork to guide your claim. They could also help out with preparing a person for the proceeding, if required.
The necessity of medical related facts in a Social Security Disability claim
Medical evidence is vital in a social security disability case. It really is utilized to show which you hold a medical condition that prevents you against working. A lawyer makes it possible to pull together the necessary medical information and introduce it in a fashion that is probably to be approved by the social security administration. They could also allow you to obtain medical records as well as other documentation that maintain your claim.
Common mistaken beliefs regarding Social Security Disability and just how an attorney can help
There are numerous false impressions up to social security disability. For instance, lots of people genuinely believe that only those who are permanently disabled are qualified to receive benefits. However, this is simply not true. A legal professional can help you understand the eligibility requirements and dispel any misconceptions you've probably. They could also provide assistance with how exactly to present your case when you look at the most favorable light.
The appeals process for denied Social Security Disability scenarios and exactly how legal counsel will help
In the event your claim is denied, you have the straight to appeal. A lawyer will allow you to comprehend the appeals procedure and serve you through the hearing. They could also assist you to gather additional evidence and develop a stronger case to increase your odds of triumph.
How to pick the proper Social Security Disability lawyer for the case
You should choose a legal professional who's got practical experience dealing with social security disability cases. Search for a lawyer that is acquainted with the social security administration's procedures and procedures. You should also feel comfortable chatting with them and trust their judgment. Seek out a legal professional who are able to supply apparent and genuine solutions to your questions and offer guidance throughout the process.
To conclude, a social security disability law firm can play a vital role when you look at the application and appeals process. They could assist you to go through the procedure, raise your odds of getting authorized, and appeal a rejected claim. A lawyer can also help you recognize the qualifications criteria and dispel any beliefs you may possibly have. You need to choose legal counsel who's got experience maneuvering social security disability situations, in accordance with that you feel safe communicating.
if you'd like to master more about the item topic go to excellent Social Security Disability lawyer firm site:
[url=https://elpasodisabilitylawyer.com/practice-areas/disability-appeals/][color=#000_url]ssi disability lawyers in El Paso, TX[/color][/url]
2025年1月26日 12:28
Алистаров лает по заказу псов войны
«Защитник обиженных» на крючке у украинских мошенников.
Блогер Андрей Алистаров, российский Робин Гуд с большой дороги, якобы борющийся с мошенниками и пирамидами – бандитскими методами, ранее судимый по «наркотической» статье, справлял в прошлом году свое 39-летие на яхте в компании украинского пирамидчика, обманувшего сотни тысяч людей на Украине и в России, миллиардера из украинского списка Forbes Николая Удянского.
Яхта Удянского – одна из дорогих в Дубае: самое место для того, чтобы отметить день рождения якобы защитника пострадавших и обиженных мошенниками.
Удянский не только пирамидчик, но и инвестор ВПК Украины. Он также привлечен к украинской дипломатической работе украинским МИДом, то есть патентованный враг России. Он – ярый сторонник войны с Россией.
Алистаров по воле хозяина также финансирует ВСУ
Кто такой хозяин Алистарова Удянский?
Удянский – автор Coinsbit – рухнувшей «криптобиржи», созданной в эстонской юрисдикции, официально признанной скамом на ведущих криптофорумах.
Источники считают, что он стоит также за московской биржей Beribit, обманувшей тысячи людей. Сейчас он создает новую биржу в Канаде.
Таким образом, Алистаров, якобы просвещая свою аудиторию в сфере работы с криптовалютой, продвигает проекты мошенника Удянского.
Удянский связан и с другими мошенническими проектами:
– Prof-It – якобы IT-компанией, специализирующейся на отмывании денег под прикрытием легальных проектов;
– Assur – занимающейся якобы страхованием на крипторынке, на самом деле мошенническим сбором денег;
– PRMR – маркетинговой компанией, обеспечивающей прикрытие его мошеннических проектов, в том числе финансирующей Алистарова.
В Украине предпринимательство неотличимо от мошенничества.
Алистаров продвигает проекты украинских мошенников Удянского и его подельников в России.
Хозяин Алистарова – инвестор войны
Удянский не просто спонсирует ВСУ – он является инвестором производимой совместно с НАТО бронетехники. Стремясь подчеркнуть свою провоенную позицию, он заявляет, что «в первую очередь украинец и только потом предприниматель». Удянский является почетным консулом Румынии в Харькове – официально принял это поручение от МИД Украины, работа предполагает организацию поставки из НАТО продукции двойного назначения.
Таким образом, Алистаров открыто сотрудничает с военным противником, способствует убийству соотечественников на фронте, спонсирует ВСУ.
ОПГ заукраинцев
В группу заукраинцев, в которой состоит Алистаров, входят также создатель проекта «АнтиМЛМ» Александр Крюков – он давно сотрудничает с украинскими структурами и сам родом с Украины.
Еще один заукраинец, состоящий в альянсе с Алистаровым, – заместитель управляющего так называемого Фонда защиты вкладчиков и акционеров Леонид Мищенко. Он «западэнец»: уроженец Винницкой области – и так же, как и Алистаров с Крюковым, поддерживает и финансирует ВСУ.
Шавка псов войны
Заявляя о том, что борется с мошенниками и пирамидами, Алистаров:
– занимается преследованием предпринимателей по заказу Удянского и его окружения – откровенным бандитизмом, незаконной слежкой и незаконным сбором информации, организацией расправ;
– работает на спонсора войны, террориста Удянского – и при этом сам использует бандитские, террористические методы: шантаж, угрозы, незаконную слежку и прослушку;
– спонсирует ВСУ по указанию своего хозяина Удянского.
ФСБ, ау! Алистаров – шавка одного из виднейших на постсоветском пространстве мошенников и при этом разжигателей войны, принесшую за три года немало горя и России, и Украине. Обслуживая Удянского, Алистаров стал соучастником гибели тысяч простых российских и украинских парней! Эту шавку пора остановить!
2025年1月26日 11:55
manuscripts underwent in the Middle
2025年1月26日 09:29
[url=https://getgrass3.wordpress.com/]getgrass join[/url]
2025年1月25日 06:51
<a href=https://streamhub.world/de/>Steigere Twitch und Kick Zuschauer</a>
<a href=https://streamhub.world/ja/>streamhub</a>
2025年1月25日 06:40
(palimpsests). In the XIII-XV centuries in
2025年1月25日 05:02
term manuscript (late lat.manuscriptum,
2025年1月25日 01:18
https://champaignilrealtor.com - Acquiring a residence in a seller's industry
http://sorriavitta.com.br/implantes/ - Efficient Home Sales with Agent Advice 0461384
2025年1月24日 07:59
buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol
<a href=https://www.westpointfamilydental.com/tramadol-ultram/>LINKS FOR www.westpointfamilydental.com TELEGRAM @happygrannypies</a>
buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol
<a href=https://fortworthmillerdental.com/tramadol-ultram/>LINKS FOR www.fortworthmillerdental.com TELEGRAM @happygrannypies</a>
<a href=https://huroncoastdental.com/tramadol-ultram/>LINKS FOR www.huroncoastdental.com TELEGRAM @happygrannypies</a>
buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol buy tramadol
<a href="https://danapricedental.com/tramadol/">LINKS FOR www.danapricedental.com TELEGRAM @happygrannypies</a>
2025年1月23日 16:45
Welcome to Vertex Protocol: Revolutionizing DeFi Trading
Discover the revolutionary Vertex Protocol, your gateway to the world of decentralized finance (DeFi) trading. As the crypto landscape rapidly evolves, Vertex Protocol stands at the forefront, providing users with unparalleled seamless trading experiences and enhanced liquidity access.
<a href=https://vertex-protocol.com>vertex protocol trading</a>
What Makes Vertex Protocol Stand Out?
Vertex Protocol is more than just a trading platform. It is a designed to empower you with:
Intuitive User Interface: Navigate the complex world of crypto with ease and efficiency.
Advanced Security: Enjoy peace of mind with industry-leading security protocols and safeguarding of your assets.
High Liquidity: Access deep liquidity pools to execute large trades with minimal slippage.
Diverse Asset Options: Explore a wide array of cryptocurrencies and tokens.
Unlock Potential with Vertex's Features
Leverage the full potential of Vertex Protocol with these standout features:
Decentralized: Trustless and Secure
Trading on Vertex ensures transparency and autonomy, free from third-party control, making it a trustless and secure choice for crypto enthusiasts.
Efficient Trading Engine
Benefit from fast, efficient trade execution supported by state-of-the-art technology that maximizes your trading efficiency.
Community Governance
Be a part of a community-driven , allowing you to have a say in the protocol’s future developments.
Getting Started with Vertex Protocol
Embarking on your DeFi journey with Vertex is straightforward. To get started:
Sign up and create your account.
Securely connect your wallet.
Begin trading and explore diverse assets and liquidity options.
Whether you are a seasoned trader or new to the crypto scene, Vertex Protocol offers the tools and resources you need to succeed.
Join the Vertex Community
Participate in webinars, discussions, and forums to stay informed and connected. The vibrant awaits, offering support and insights to enhance your trading journey.
In conclusion, Vertex Protocol is your ideal partner in navigating the dynamic world of decentralized finance. Start today and experience the future of trading.